FACEBOOK To Offer Movie Streaming.

So, epic social networking site Facebook has joined the content streaming bandwagon.  Just like Netflix, Hulu, Amazon and other Video-On-Demand (VOD) sites Facebook has decided to offer movies via their fan pages for their consumers.  This means that companies like Netflix and Red Box will have some difficulties retaining their audiences (Netflix's stock has decreased 6% due to this news).

Facebook has decided to start slowly.  They have begun with Nolan's THE DARK KNIGHT as a guinea pig, selling the full film content for three Facebook credits (about $3.00).  This means that after the transaction has occurred, within about 48 hours you will have access to the content.  Facebook (and WB execs) think that if you create a habit of visiting Facebook anyways (like 600 million people do), why not have streaming content available to 1) keep you on Facebook longer, and 2) to gain more profit from what you already do (watch movies and visit Facebook).

If the results are deemed successful, then the content streaming abilities will be rolled out to other Warner Bros. films, and then since Hollywood works best on peer pressure, others are sure to follow.  But the real question is if consumers will really want to watch films on Facebook.  I think the jury is still out on that one, but my guess is that it will become wildly popular, further distancing Facebook from it's original purpose, connecting friends.

So, what do you think?  Do you like that Facebook is offering streamed content online?  Or is it too far out of Facebook's realm?

Recent Grammy Winner: Esperanza Spalding Serenades USC

Coming off of her Grammy win for Best New Artist, Esperanza Spalding visited USC's Bovard Auditorium to serenade the students and the general public.  While she is well-deserving of the Grammy win, many were shocked by her win.  Justin Bieber (the somewhat "favorite" for the category) fans apparently trashed her Wikipedia page post-win in typical pre-teen rebellion.  However, after hearing her in concert, her win was not that surprising.

Born in 1984, the young artist has been hitting the jazz circuit hard.  She received a full scholarship to Berklee School of Music (the preeminent music school, right up there with Juilliard).  However, this wouldn't be the only time this school has been in her life, she then became the youngest professor at the school at the age of 20.

Now, her music is definitely jazz-y.  With clear jazz techniques of improvisation, solos from all of the members of the band, and scatting, Spalding continues the jazz tradition.  Her combo band in concert included piano, violin, viola, cello, drums, back up singer and of course Spalding on vocals and string bass.    But with her soulful, dreamy voice, the scatting sounded more like a waterfall than abrasive as it sometimes can sound.  And then her string bass acts as a character himself on the stage.  She plays him with dexterity of a professor at a major school of music, but with the emotion of a true artist.  In many ways, she dances with the string bass, swaying side to side with it as though wooing the large instrument.

My stand out favorite songs from her concert was "Apple Blossom"  (from her CD entitled Chamber Music Society) and "Fall In" (from her earlier CD entitled Esperanza).  She is really more emoting these songs then singing them, making jazz accessible to a diverse audience.  Speaking of diverse, she clearly has many cultural influences depicted in her music.  This reminds me of another jazz icon, Miles Davis's amazing record: Sketches of Spain, which uses flamenco influences.  Like Davis, Spalding uses other musical styles (everything from hip hop to soul) to create her unique sound.

And even more special in the jazz community is the fact that Spalding is a bassist.  Usually and more traditionally, instrumental jazz groups generally revolve around a brass instrument.  With such famous jazz musicians as Miles Davis (trumpet), Dizzy Gillespie (trumpet), and Charlie "Bird" Parker (saxophone).  Or if not brass, then piano, like famed eccentric Thelonius Monk.  But how many bassist can you name?  That's right, not many.  So, Spalding with her youthful energy and appreciation for her genre really is becoming a stand-out on the jazz scene.  She is definitely the next it-thing in the jazz world, and if the pop/hip hop crazed Grammy's giving top awards to her?  Spalding must be something special indeed.

 Listen to Esperanza Spalding singing "Fall In" here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuKSM5XvFfU&feature=related

Listen to Esperanza Spalding singing various songs here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBZa7-2bG2I

What Are Your (boy) FRIENDS Up To?

                             

So, since our FRIENDS have all been up to such interesting projects since their time at Central Perk, I thought a friendly check-in was due.  

THE ONE WITH TWO PARTS: PART TWO: THE BOYS.

MATT LeBLANC: While his other FRIENDS were heading off pursuing non-FRIENDS related careers, LeBlanc chose to continue playing his famed-role, Joey in the ill-advised JOEY.  This premise was about FRIENDS character Joey Tribbiani spinning off into La La Land to pursue his acting career.  However, JOEY just proved that without the support of the full ensemble cast of FRIENDS, Joey was not viable.  So, after this went south, he remained low profile (understandably if you ever saw JOEY).  However, recently he has graced the small screen with a new role: himself.  Yes, he actually plays Matt LeBlanc in Showtime's EPISODES.  With its premier in early 2011, the show has been received well.  Similar to Kirstie Alley's FAT ACTRESS the show chronicles LeBlanc's love/hate relationship with fame.  However, unlike FAT ACTRESS (also on Showtime), EPISODES is not solely about LeBlanc.  It's really about this British couple (played by Stephen Mangan and Tamsin Greig) who have a hit comedic television show in the UK and are convinced to adapt it for American audiences in Los Angeles (basically what Gervais's THE OFFICE did).  However, (like THE OFFICE), the UK version is superior to the American counterpart in almost every way.  And when the studio forces lead actor Matt LeBlanc onto the writers, the show within a show goes from bad to worse.  Soon its about a hockey coach's one-liners and a librarian with short skirts.  EPISODES really soars and LeBlanc is actually funny without resorting to Joey-esque humor.  Bravo, LeBlanc, for playing a non-FRIENDly role.  The show is certainly a better bet than JOEY ever was and will have a larger arc than FAT ACTRESS (which literally only focused on her weight).  I would highly recommend watching LeBlanc's new show: EPISODES.  

MATTHEW PERRY: Matthew Perry was always my favorite male cast member of FRIENDS because of his dry, sarcastic wit.  So when I heard his latest project MR. SUNSHINE was airing on ABC (in the timeslot of FRIENDS friend Courtney Cox), I was excited.  His previous television series post-FRIENDS was STUDIO 60 ON THE SUNSET STRIP.  A show that was definitely much better than it was given credit for.  But with the ratings subpar, the show was cancelled.  But now with MR. SUNSHINE, our sarcastic bestie is back.  However, despite the fact that the cast is promising (hilarious Allison Janney leads the group), the pilot and second episode were mediocre.  And I really wanted to love this show.  You see, the premise explains that Matthew Perry's character is the general manager of the Sunshine Center (sort of like the Staples Center) where sports and entertainment are supplied to the masses.  However, since no outside life is established for our funny lead, it becomes a work-place comedy complete with nepotistic assistants, crazy bosses, and little substance.  Sure, it has it's comedic moments, but is not my bet for best comedy of the year.  That probably goes to MODERN FAMILY and while this hilarious show leads into MR. SUNSHINE, it's not enough to make it a hit.  Plus, like a lot of his FRIENDS are trying to avoid, Perry still keeps Chandler-esque humor alive and well, which may be his downfall.  

DAVID SCHWIMMER:  Schwimmer's post-FRIENDS life has been fairly underwraps.  Known for wanting to direct more (he directed a few episodes on FRIENDS), he's done a few projects, but nothing really well-known besides his HBO series LITTLE BRITAIN USA.  However, he has been the voice of Melman in MADAGASCAR the animated feature films and shorts.  Onto his third feature for this animated family series, Schwimmer keeps busy, but remains quiet.  But with his one-episode role on 30 ROCK, Schwimmer proves he doesn't need a Ross-and-Rachel role to keep it interesting.  Yet with this, he has been active in his somewhat native Chicago (he attended Northwestern University) with Lookingglass Theatre.  As a co-founder of this theatre company he has acted and directed numerous shows and guides the company.   Schwimmer is quoted to have said: "I've made a good amount of money. I'm very happy that I can now support my theatre company and support friends and family, and I'm ready to maybe go back to school and change careers."  So, who knows what will come next for Schwimmer, but we are looking forward to it.  

                         

What are your (girl) FRIENDS up to?

So, since our FRIENDS have all been up to such interesting projects since their time at Central Perk, I thought a friendly check-in was due.  

THE ONE WITH TWO PARTS: PART ONE: THE GIRLS.

JENNIFER ANISTON:  Aniston has had a string of successful/semi-successful romantic comedies as of late.  Just coming out this weekend was JUST GO WITH IT, co-starring Adam Sandler.  While jury is out on how well this will really go over, the reviews have been mixed.  Rotten Tomatoes critic forum gives it a terrible 18%, leading me to conclude it can't be that good.  But previous rom-coms THE SWITCH (co-starring Jason Bateman) and THE BOUNTY HUNTER (co-starring Gerald Butler) have been more successful.  The question is, if she is 42, why is she doing romantic comedies?  Now ask anyone who knows me and they will tell you that adore Ms. Aniston, but why is she still doing these movies?  Her days as a dramatic actress in a film like THE GOOD GIRL were strong, but fleeting.  Where have these juicer roles gone for her?  She needs to do more roles like this.  And while I appreciated her stint opposite bff Courtney Cox in sitcom COUGAR TOWN, this is not her arena anymore.  Aniston needs to sink her teeth into some serious meat.  

(Though on a side note, I appreciate her outspoken friend Chelsea Handler, who denounced Angelina Jolie on her E late night show, Chelsea Lately, for Aniston, something Cox couldn't do).  

COURTNEY COX: Cox has been keeping very busy, just like gal-pal Aniston.  She has been starring in her suburban cul-de-sac of a show called COUGAR TOWN on ABC.  In it's second season, Cox is the only friend who has really done the sitcom game again.  With this show (though hideously titled) Cox plays an older woman, looking for love.  With its off-beat humor and notable one-liners, the show can soar.  However, it is certainly not as endearing as FRIENDS was as it often times lacks depth and heart.  But, between another sitcom, like TWO AND A HALF MEN, COUGAR TOWN this show will win out every time.  Why?  Because TWO AND A HALF MEN is sitcom-slime to the tenth degree and really dumbs down it's audience.  Even though COUGAR TOWN doesn't take itself seriously, just like it's Sheen-starring counterpart, it does have really interesting characters and a new take on the love triangle plot line.  Plus with guest stars like Emmy-gold Aniston, and series regular tv-icon Busy Philips, the show has some street-cred.  But, only a bit.  Will it last 10 season like FRIENDS?  Hell no.  Does it add to the fun of Comedy Wednesday on ABC, yes.  And to Cox's credit, she does not play Monica in this sitcom.  Something her other FRIENDS have been pigeonholed into.  

LISA KUDROW:  Kudrow has kept her recent activity fairly quiet, though guest spot on Cox's COUGAR TOWN did keep her busy for a week or so in 2010.  But beyond that, and that terrible movie HOTEL FOR DOGS, she has been keeping a low-profile.  The most recent film she was in (that was of worth) was EASY A, starring the newcomer (and now red carpet maven) Emma Stone.  Kudrow plays a guidance counselor at Stone's high school.  This off-beat character fits Kudrow, but isn't too much like her alter-ego Phoebe.  She has some great actors to play off of in this film including Stanley Tucci, Malcolm McDowell and Thomas Haden Church.   

Kudrow has some phenomenal lines in this film including my personal favorite: 

"He brought a knife to school. It's just a butter knife,

but you know what they say, it's a gateway knife."

Read the review for EASY A here: http://cuckookachooanartsreview.blogspot.com/2010_08_01_archive.html

But Kudrow has also been creating a one-woman improvised webisode WEB THERAPY where she plays a therapist.  You can visit the site here: http://www.lstudio.com/web-therapy/  Though I haven't heard too much about it, at least she is doing something and keeping her comedy alive.

NEXT UP?  What are your (boy) FRIENDS up to?  

  

SUNDANCE 2011: JESS + MOSS

JESS + MOSS is a really wonderful film about two kids (Jess is 18, Moss is 12) and their summer in Kentucky.  While the two seem an unlikely duo due to their age difference, they are actually the best of friends and know each other better than anyone.  Dealing with tragedy (Moss's parents passed away tragically) they find ways to relate.  But the story is not really why you should see this film.  It's really more of a concept film than an actual plot-driven film.  Because, nothing really happens.  Yep, there is no plot.  However, you do learn an awful lot about these characters throughout the course of the film.  In a way, it sort of reminds me Kristen Dunst's MARIE ANTOINETTE in that nothing happens, but then so much happened, too.  However, unlike MARIE ANTOINETTE, these characters have a real arc and history (no pun intended).

The film concentrates on the theme of memory.  A fascinating choice when you consider that memories are probably the most precious personal commodity we have, but the least tangible.  With dealing with the families and their lives we see these two connect in unusual and unexpected ways.  And the film holds true to using memory not just in the front-of-camera arena, but behind the camera, too.  Well, really its IN the camera.  You see, this film uses expired and degraded film stocks.  What does this mean?  Well, first off, in the new era of digital media, this film is actually shot on 16mm film.  Shocker for a low-budget indie shot on the director's parent's farm in Kentucky.  But the "expired and degraded" part means that this was film that was not supposed to be used.  The effect is magical.  With a film all about memory, the partially destroyed, weakened, and sometimes grainy film evokes the theme of memory.  It's as if we as an audience are remembering the story of JESS + MOSS and the details are fuzzy.  Its absolutely brilliant.

The actors, Jess (played by Sarah Hagen, best known for BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER, and FREAKS AND GEEKS) and Moss (newcomer Austin Vickers) are a vibrant pair.  With Hagen's street cred and unusual looks and voice, she lends a whimsical, vintage hispter vibe to the young Kentucky native, in a realistic and also moving way.  And then Vickers presents Moss sweetly and naively but we see him grow and develop over the film and his acting, though clearly he was a novice, is really not too bad.  But I must say without Hagen there to lend support, Vickers would have fallen short.  But there are some real moments when Vickers is honest and vulnerable, a difficult task for such a new actor.

Overall, this film is highly worth the watch.  Though it certainly would not be for everyone.  It's artsy, but not annoyingly so.  It's plotless, but has an arc.  And it is a fantastic study on memories and how we keep people and things alive after they've gone.

Rent/Buy/Go See JESS + MOSS if...
-you like Sarah Hagen (you will not be disappointed).
-you like "plot less" shows that are really just an exploration of character.
-you like good cinema without the flash and whirlygigs of tentpoles.

See the trailer here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ9PJ7zRLTU&feature=youtube_gdata

Friday Night Lights: Clear Eyes, Full Hearts, Can't Lose.

I interrupt the SUNDANCE 2011 reviews to bring you a goodbye to a phenomenal show, FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS.

This is the best show that no one saw.

No one saw, huh?  That's right.  This show which has garnered 35 nominations from various award ceremonies over the past five seasons and was a show that no one saw.  Why you ask?  Well, this show has had an interesting past.  It premiered on NBC (the owner of the rights), to flop-like ratings.  However, with such tremendous support from critics and NBC execs, the show found a new distribution pathway - DirecTV.  Yes, unusual.  This means that only those who get DirecTV can see what happens with Jason Street, Tim Riggins, Matt Saracen and Coach Taylor in the following seasons.  So, after the season airs on DirecTV, NBC then re-runs them on NBC months later but at a less-than-prestigious time slot.  That actually sounds like a decent compromise, because if the DirecTV deal didn't go through, there would have been only one season, instead of five.

So, now that we understand why this show didn't hold an audience due to its unfamiliar distribution strategy, we must turn to the story itself.  FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS (FNL) is a drama that is shot in a documentary-style.  It follows Coach Eric Taylor (football coach in a small town of Dillon, TX) and his wife, Tami, and daughter, Julie, as they deal with high school, football, and living large in Texas.  Sounds terrible, right?  Or at least it sounds like any old primetime soap, right?  Well you are wrong.  This show is not over the top, this show is probably the most realistic depiction of small town, USA on television.  There is so much heart and courage in not just the stories, but in the style and acting that the show resonates with numerous, die-hard fans of all ages.  First off, the football is accurate, not just "played at" but is the most accurate of any sports I have seen depicted on television.  Second, the relationships between the high school sweethearts, the best friends, the married couples and the town are all well within the realm of reality and are probably too accurate.  This is why the show did not succeed on its first run on NBC.  The show is too accurate.

Today, our television waves are too full of sensationalism (oh my!  there's a bomb inside a body!  or... oh my!  there's a pike running thru a person, but they can still walk!), that any accurate television sends us into sleep mode.  Well, FNL is here to combat this and finally present some critically acclaimed sports drama to network television.  But unfortunately, not enough heard this call to duty.  This show is heart wrenching.  There are so many moments I can count that have made me reflect on my own time in a small town, and the people I met there.  And beyond that, the characters you meet in FNL are by far some of the most relatable characters that when you get to see them grow, you feel like you've known them your whole life.

Finally, this show (though now it just finished its series finale last night on DirecTV), has received the credit it deserves, though a bit late.  It has been nominated for 8 Emmy's, finally winning 1 (for outstanding casting).  But you know how award shows work, the viewers at home have to know the winner, and so this "little engine that could" was passed over for the big win numerous times in favor of more well-known shows.  However, in 2010, Kyle Chandler (Coach Eric Taylor) and Connie Britton (Tami Taylor) finally (FINALLY!) got nominated for their work with an Emmy for Outstanding Lead Actor and Actress, respectively.  Now, they didn't win, but the nomination was a lot of validation for these two actors who have by far created the most realistic marriage on screen.  By far.

Now, I know, I know, you all must think that I am over-exaggerating this, but I assure you, I am not.

This is the best television show that no one saw.

You should rent/buy FRIDAY NIGHT LIGHTS on dvd if...
-you enjoy football or sports in general.
-you enjoy small town portrayals that are accurate.
-you enjoy really well-acted and well-crafted television.
-you want to see a marriage depicted actually realistically by some fine actors.

This is a show that hopefully will live on through dvd sales:

http://www.amazon.com/Friday-Night-Lights-First-Season/dp/B000RF1QE2

SUNDANCE SHORT: THIS IS NOT A SUIT

SUNDANCE 2011: SHORT FILMS: THIS IS NOT A SUIT.

THIS IS NOT A SUIT is a short film by A. Sauvage is part advertisement part art.  A. Sauvage is a tailor who presents fashion shows at the world's largest arenas, like London Fashion Week.  His clean cut style and classic lines transfers to not only his clothing lines (entitled THIS IS NOT A SUIT), but also to his short film.  

The film explores what it means to be an artist, a designer, and a tastemaker.  Best of all, the film itself is artistic with design aesthetics, and a tastemaker itself.  With it's white background, the suit stands forward as the main character - seconded only by the man who wears it.  The film not only is a character study into the designer himself, but into the idea of what an artist is.  With a smirk and a wink, the short not only manages to advertise his suits (which are classically gorgeous), but it makes a statement about arts and where artists are in our society.  With its dated (yes, dated, but with nostalgia, too) voiceover the film feels like it came out of the 1960s instead of the 21st century.  This gives the film some wit, some charm, and some real class.  With its MAD MEN feel, the film reminds us of the importance of art in our daily lives - including what we wear.  And like the big tent-pole movies, the combination of art and commerce is entangled in this short.  This short is a MUST-SEE.

See it if:

You like design and fashion.

You like quirky, smirking shorts.

You like Mad Men.  

You find the journey and charisma of the artist fascinating. 

BEST OF ALL: See it on You Tube here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2HfNg3ScM0

SUNDANCE 2011: SUBMARINE IS A MUST-SEE.

SUNDANCE 2011: SUBMARINE

SUBMARINE (directed by Richard Ayoade, executive produced by Ben Stiller) is a must-see from the 2011 Sundance line up.  This brit comedy is about an adolescent boy who must deal with his mother's infidelities and his girlfriend's mother's illness.  In this quick-witted and quirky film, lead actor Craig Roberts plays the precocious Oliver Tate with style and effectiveness.  Opposite Roberts is young actress Yasmin Paige who plays a strong-willed teen with grace and serious acting chops.  These two shine in this world where sometimes keeping the outside at a distance is the only way to survive, until eventually you must deal with it.

However, the real star is the film's style.  With it's independent vibe, but commercial appeal, it may be 2011's version of LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE.  The editing is fantastic.  Using freeze-frames, eye-contact with the camera, and separate monologues with black backgrounds break the classic narrative flow, but are incredibly effective.  These moments allow the audience to focus on a small change in the scene, emphasizing a reaction or plot point.  All in all, this film's editing and execution is what drives it and sets it apart from other coming of age stories.

This film has charm.  That's probably the best way to describe it.  Charm.  And with it's Brit humor and confidence, I am sure it will be picked up for a (at the very least) a limited engagement in NY and LA theatres.  However, if it doesn't get to a city near you, keep it on your Netflix and DVD list, it's worth it.

GO SEE IT IF:
You like coming of age stories.
You like Brit humor.
You like a little quirk and charm.
You like self-reflexive films (ie films that know they are films, and are not edited classically).

Below is a humorous description of the film from the perspective of the lead character, Oliver Tate (the precocious 15 year old):

I have been waiting too long for the film of my life. My name is Oliver Tate. This film will capture my particular idiosyncrasies, for example, the way I seduce my classmate Jordana Bevan using only my mind.  Also, since my parents’ marriage is being threatened by a man who runs courses on Mental and Physical Wellbeing, the film will probably feature some elaborate set-pieces of me taking him down. There will be helicopter shots. There will be slow-mo, but also transcendent moments, like when I cure my father’s depression. Knowing me as I do, I will be surprised if this film runs to less than three hours. Note to the press: appropriate adjectives to describe this film include “breath-taking” and “irresistible” as well the phrase: “a monumental achievement”.




SEE TRAILER AND DIRECTOR INTERVIEW AT:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L6p3ZU2EeU


STAY TUNED FOR MORE SUNDANCE 2011 REVIEWS!

SUNDANCE 2011: THE NINE MUSES Is UnInspired

  

Sundance 2011: Reviews: THE NINE MUSES

So, I watched John Akomfrah's THE NINE MUSES at the Yarrow Theatre in Park City, Utah during the ten day festival.  And I must say, "A" for the concept, "F" for the execution.  The film is based on Homer's THE ODYSSEY (a great start to a film) and uses text from the lyrical and poetic classic to discuss the life of an immigrant.  Since Homer's THE ODYSSEY is all about coming home, this suits the immigrant-tale since he is always searching for home or for a new home.  Great.

This is where it gets a little rocky.  Akomfrah starts to use quoted passages not from THE ODYSSEY, but from passages from such authors as: Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, and Emily Dickinson.  Now, I have no problem quoting other works, especially as important as these and the others he quoted.  However, my problem results when there lacks focus.  When each section of the film (which corresponds to the nine muses) is diverse it can be difficult to hold them together.  Not to mention that he uses the most chiched passages from these authors.  Most of which I could quote myself from memory.  Now I understand that the familiarity can breed a connection to the work.  It can also breed a lot of unimagined cliches.

Now, add to the pile of stuff, some music.  Don't get me wrong its great soothing, mysterious original tones, but it was present the whole movie.  Which then becomes repetitive.  Now, add to this the static (and I mean static) images of a man in a yellow (sometimes blue, sometimes red) parka standing in the middle of a path looking at a mountain (sometimes a road, sometimes on a boat).  Now I understand isolated individuals looking out contemplatively can work to create a feeling of solidarity, but when it is the entire 90 minutes (and did I mention they were static) it becomes trite.  I literally thought they were photographs (not moving film) until I saw a bird fly by, which reminded me that Akomfrah did this static style on purpose.  For the entire film.

Now, some of the more interesting parts were when they intercut BBC archival footage of various things. However, it was so haphazard and difficult to follow along that I often did not know what was in the footage and how it related.  Perhaps intertitles with the situation and the date could have been useful to connect the dots for us.  Which is too bad, cause that could have saved the film.  

 Like I said, the idea was particularly interesting and if it took it upon itself to follow one man on his own odyssey (much like Homer did), using the music and Homer's words, with some explained inter-splicing of the BBC footage, the film could have been a knockout.  So concept was amazing (and the write up in the SUNDANCE book, too), but the film did not hold up in person, which is a real shame.

STAY TUNED: For more SUNDANCE 2011 Reviews!

SUNDANCE 2011

This is the first of many reviews of SUNDANCE 2011. I plan on reviewing the various feature length and short films that I saw over the four days I was at the festival, but first, I want to give a little background information for any SUNDANCE novices out there.

The SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL is a festival that occurs for 10 days in January. The festival is located in Park City, Utah, just 45 minutes from Salt Lake City. It is the largest and most well-known independent film festival in the United States. The festival was founded in 1978 by Sterling Van Wagenen under the name Utah/US Film Festival. However, with the involvement of Robert Redford (for all intensive purposes, the real founder) in 1981 it moved from September to January, hoping to attract Hollywood types with it's ski resort location and timing. Then, in 1991 Redford changed the name to SUNDANCE, named after his break out role opposite long-time cohort Paul Newman in BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID. In this film Redford played the Sundance Kid and thus the name of the festival was solidified.

Many directors and films have had their big break come from being a part of the coveted official selection of SUNDANCE. This list includes but is not limited to: Quentin Tarantino, Steven Soderbergh, Darren Aronofsky, SAW, GARDEN STATE, THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT, RESERVOIR DOGS, LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, WAITING FOR SUPERMAN, CLERKS, THANK YOU FOR SMOKING, PRECIOUS and NAPOLEON DYNOMITE (just to name a few).

The festival has a competition as each of the selections are divided into categories (dramatic, comedic, documentary etc...). The most coveted award is the Grand Jury Award, followed by the Audience Award (voted on by the audience at the festival). These awards help these small films find an audience and perhaps even a distribution company.

That brings me to: Why SUNDANCE? Well, the point of film festivals is for small films and green talent to gain some exposure. The best scenario for any film or filmmaker is to find a distributor for their film. A great example of this is LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE, which played at SUNDANCE and then was distributed for a theatrical release. It then went on to win two Oscars. For the actors, its a way to rub elbows with Hollywood and gain some networking perks. For anyone, getting into SUNDANCE is a big deal and an important step for their career.

How does it work? Well there are numerous theaters where each film plays a few times (usually 4-5 times). You buy a ticket (or wait in the waitlist line) and see the film. After the film, the director (and often times the cast and crew) are there to lead a Q&A with the audience. Perhaps they will even stick around for photos and additional one-on-one time with audience members. Then SUNDANCE also hosts various panel discussions, further Q&A's, concerts and parties. SUNDANCE is a great way to network with film buffs, execs, and stars.

STAY TUNED: for reviews on the films I screened in the next postings.